Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's the difference?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What's the difference?

    Can someone please explain to me how you differentiate between the following:

    Nymph
    Spiderling
    Juvenile
    Sub Adult
    Adult

    It's been bugging me how I would classify mine as they grow.

    Any info appreciated!

  • #2
    Originally posted by Johanna McMullen View Post
    Can someone please explain to me how you differentiate between the following:

    Nymph
    Spiderling
    Juvenile
    Sub Adult
    Adult

    It's been bugging me how I would classify mine as they grow.

    Any info appreciated!

    Johanna,
    Here's an explanation of some terms: http://atshq.org/Development.pdf These are generally useful. Spiderling and juvenile can be interchangeable with young, immature (numbered by instar). Nymph can be postembryo.

    I hope the article is helpful.

    Rhys
    Rhys A. Brigida

    Associate Editor, American Tarantula Society Forum Magazine.
    Fan, member, and friend to the BTS since 1990-ish something or other.
    If you like the BTS message board, you might enjoy this one as well:
    http://www.atshq.org

    "Nhandu", a piano improvisation and "Opiliones Walk", hip hop for 8 legs. Hear it at: www.myspace.com/rbrigid1

    Comment


    • #3
      In simpler terms the first stages are as follows.

      Egg -> Nymph 1 (Eggs with legs) -> Nymph 2 (Mobile nymphs i.e. they can walk around) -> Spiderling.

      I'm led to believe that some sp. can also have a Nymph 3 stage but this is a major exception to the rule.

      Juvenile is more complicated. My understanding is that a spider is generally considered a juvenile when its adult colouration can be seen.

      Subadult is a matter of opinion. I would expect a subadult to be within a couple of moults of maturity

      Technically, I guess, an adult is either a mature female or a mature male. Mature males will have emboli, and mature females will have well developed spermathecae (except for E. olivacea and S.longibulbi), and be breedable.

      Hope that doesn't confuse the issue too much

      Obviously classifying them by instar is more accurate, and some people will say things like 5th moult spiderling, so that can be used too.
      Last edited by Phil Rea; 12-03-07, 12:22 PM.

      My Collection:

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks both!
        Makes a bit more sense now!

        Comment


        • #5
          Hello Johanna,

          One thing that might prove confusing is a few differences in terminology between US keepers and Brits and other Europeans. The terms Phil posted aren't used in the US. I realize you are from the UK and this is a UK forum, but it might be helpful to be aware of these differences. US terminology in bold.

          From Phil's post:

          Egg -> Nymph 1 (Eggs with legs) -> Nymph 2 (Mobile nymphs i.e. they can walk around) -> Spiderling

          egg = embryo
          nymph 1 = postembryo ("eggs with legs")
          nymph 2 = 1st instar ("mobile, pale-colored nymphs")
          spiderling = 2nd instar ("fully-pigmented, feeding nymphs")

          instar = entomological term for an insect or arachnid life-stage separated by ecdysis (molting); these life-stages are properly known as "stadia" (singular = "stadium")

          As Phil correctly noted, some species (e.g., Poecilotheria formosa, P. metallica) don't reach "spiderling stage" until 3rd instar. That is, they have an additional molt before they become "fully pigmented, feeding nymphs".

          Of course, there are other exceptions: for example, although we use the "feeding nymphs" description for spiderlings, it is documented that even 1st instar nymphs may feed by cannibalism.

          The term "spiderling" is used as slang for any early instar tarantula. Technically, with each successive molt it becomes 3rd instar, 4th instar... 9th instar, etc. So, the terms you asked about, such as "spiderling, juvenile, subadult" are really arbitrary terms used in the hobby to give an approximation of size/life stage. I don't believe I have ever seen someone advertise a spider or a post a photo and call it, for example, "11th instar". Terms used for other animals such as reptiles (e.g., "subadults") just seem less cumbersome. And what an "11th instar" actually is depends on the species. For example, in fast maturing species such as Pterinochilus murinus or Poecilotheria regalis an 11th instar might be sexually mature, whereas in slow growing species such as Grammostola rosea an "11th instar" would be less than half grown.

          So, how you apply these arbitrary and admittedly vague terms is up to your discretion. Let's just say you have a Brachypelma smithi... how would you classify it with these arbitrary terms - smaller than 1.5" in legspan as spiderling? 1.5-3.5" juvenile? 3.5-4.5" subadult? 4-5-6" adult? These would be reasonable, but obviously would be open to great debate and differ from keeper to keeper. When I was still a spider dealer, I applied these terms similar to how I have in my example; that is, based on the maximum/adult size of the particular species. A buyer gets a pretty good idea of what a subadult G. rosea is, but would likely be confounded by an 18th instar

          Other technical terms worthy of note are "penultimate", "ultimate" and "postultimate". I believe the link Rhys provided can help you with these. It is easy to determine when a male is "ultimate", that is, has molted to sexual maturity and, should he molt yet again, "postultimate", but in females these terms are a bit more difficult to discern.

          Kind regards, Michael
          Last edited by Michael Jacobi; 12-03-07, 06:27 PM.
          MICHAEL JACOBI - exoticfauna@gmail.com
          -> Exotic Fauna, The Tarantula Bibliography, ARACHNOCULTURE E-Zine - exoticfauna.com
          -> The British Tarantula Society - thebts.co.uk
          | michael.jacobi@thebts.co.uk
          -> TARANTULAS.com - tarantulas.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Michael Jacobi View Post
            instar = entomological term for an insect or arachnid life-stage separated by ecdysis (molting); these life-stages are properly known as "stadia" (singular = "stadium")


            So, how you apply these arbitrary and admittedly vague terms is up to your discretion. Let's just say you have a Brachypelma smithi... how would you classify it with these arbitrary terms - smaller than 1.5" in legspan as spiderling? 1.5-3.5" juvenile? 3.5-4.5" subadult? 4-5-6" adult? These would be reasonbable, but obviously would be open to great debate and differ from keeper to keeper. When I was still a spider dealer, I applied these terms similar to how I have in my example; that is, based on the maximum/adult size of the particular species. A buyer gets a pretty good idea of what a subadult G. rosea is, but would likely be confounded by an 18th instar

            Was excellent to get an understanding of the term 'Instar' at last, and that was an incredibly informative response!

            It's one hell of a lot clearer to me in laymans terms now!

            As you suggest, each country may refer to things differently, as will individuals, and as such I appreciate everybody who has responded to my query.

            And I liked your reference there to what you would class as 'Juvenile' dependant on the species and it's growing rate!

            Thanks again that was just what I was looking for!

            J

            Comment


            • #7
              Johanna, never mind the technical terms, being a Yorkshire man i would say about £35!

              £3 - £5 for a sling
              £10 - to £20 for a Juvinile
              and around £20 to £40 for an adult.....

              So thats the way to differentiate in Yorkshire!!!!
              Everyones an Expert! "Ex" is a has been - "spurt" is a strong gush of water! You decide............................

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by J M Clegg View Post
                Johanna, never mind the technical terms, being a Yorkshire man i would say about £35!
                Ah... brings back fond down to earth childhood memories of my time in yorkshire when visiting relatives.
                "Say what you mean and mean what you say" thats the motto eh Mr. Clegg.

                "You can take the man out of Yorkshire but you can't take the yorkshire out of the man" as my Uncle used to say.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Superb! No messing about, that's what I like to see! :0)

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X